JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)April 27, 2011

A- de 2011

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice María Victoria Calle Correa

✓Claimant Comision De Regulacion De Comunicaciones (Crc) Y Otros

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Aclaracion Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Procedencia excepcional respecto de conceptos o frases contenidas en la parte resolutiva o que influyan en ella
Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Hace tránsito a cosa juzgada
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de aclarar el alcance de la declaratoria de exequibilidad de los apartes demandados del artículo 22 numeral 4 de la Ley 1341 de 2009, contenida en la sentencia C-403/10.

La Corte reitera la imposibilidad que le asiste para aclarar las sentencias que profiere en ejercicio del control abstracto de constitucionalidad, dado el carácter jurisdiccional y no consultivo de la Corporación, por lo que rechaza por improcedente la solicitud de aclaración.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. RECHAZAR por improcedente las solicitudes de aclaracion formuladas por la Comision de Regulacion de Comunicaciones (CRC), la Agencia Nacional del Espectro, el Ministerio de Tecnologias de la Informacion y las comunicaciones y Avantel respecto de la sentencia C-403 de 2010.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.